Skip to main content  
  Helping the environment one joke at a time, Grinning Planet. Click to go to home page. flying letter; click to go to signup page for free email version
Get GP free
via email !
 
   
       
 

Glass Bottle Packaging -- Reuse vs. Recycling

For glass bottle packaging, glass reuse is more efficient than glass recycling

Eco-Logical cartoon graphic of cube-shaped globe

GLASS RECYCLING IS NOT NECESSARILY A SMASHING IDEA
Glass Bottle Packaging — Reuse vs. Recycling

Imagine the following: You go to the kitchen, pull a glass out of the cabinet, and pour a delicious glassful of "Wheat Grass and Cranberry Spritzer" or whatever drink suits your fancy. You drink it down. Mmm. Then you picture of glasses of iced tea put the glass in the recycle bin. Every time you or someone else in your household uses a glass for a drink, into the recycle bin it goes. Every week when you go to the grocery store, you buy new glasses. Keep imagining.... Restaurants do the same thing—every glass of wine, beer, water or whiskey they serve requires a new glass, rather than being served in a glass that gets washed and reused.

What is the point of this Bizarro World of Glassware? The idea is to imagine the inefficiency that would be inherent in such glass use:

  • the energy required to transport and process the additional "glass to be recycled";
  • the energy required to create the new glassware from recycled glass (or from raw materials, when people aren't recycling properly);
  • the pollution associated with these operations;
  • or, in the worst case, where people are too lazy to recycle their glasses, the disposal costs.

Of course, we do not do this with the glasses in our kitchen cabinets—we reuse them hundreds of times. But realize that the Bizarro World of Glassware DOES apply to glass bottle packaging. The glass bottles and jars in which we buy juice, fancy teas, spaghetti sauce, and other food and beverage products are not cleaned and reused in the US, they are recycled (or, all too often, just tossed in the trash). Even the better case, recycling, requires the glass bottle packaging to be stripped of its labels, melted down, and reformed into new glass. This is far more energy-intensive than sterilizing and reusing the bottles.

So, why don't we do the sensible thing and reuse glass bottles? Or is this idea just a brainless pipedream from someone who's taken one too many swigs off the ol' bottle of prune ripple?

GLASS BOTTLE PACKAGING ECONOMICS

Recycling glass does indeed save energy as compared to using raw ingredients to make new glass. picture of glass bottles for recycling The Glass Packaging Institute notes that energy costs drop about 2-3% for every 10% of recycled glass used in the manufacturing process. Glass bottle recycling also reduces resource use and pollution.

But what about glass bottle reuse? Good news! Costs drop even more when glass packages are sterilized and reused without being crushed, melted, and reformed. There are many factors that affect the costs and efficiencies associated with a bottle reuse program as compared to recycling "non-refillables," including:

  • Whether deposits on refillable bottles (or taxes on non-refillable bottles) are required to increase recovery rates of refillables.
  • How successful local recycling programs are at collecting non-refillable bottles.
  • How willing retailers are to accommodate collection programs for refillables.
  • Whether the beverage industry will geographically restructure its bottling operations to reduce the distance traveled by refillables.
  • Whether beverage companies will collaborate to use industry-standard bottles (or whether governments are willing to force them to do so).

Cost-benefit analyses must make assumptions about these and other factors related to consumer behavior, government policy, manufacturers' attitudes, and more. But studies have indeed been done, and overall the message is clear—from an efficiency standpoint, using refillable glass bottles is one of the least costly packaging methods, beating even the lowly wax-covered carton, which is one of the least-expensive one-way packaging options. The most expensive packaging option—of any kind—is usually found to be non-returnable glass bottles.

So, if it's so economically advantageous, why don't we do it?

BARRIERS TO GLASS BOTTLE REUSE

There are three main sticking points when it comes to changing over from using disposable glass bottles to using refillable glass bottles. The first is the beverage industry, where packaging has become part of marketing. Whether the bottle is plastic or glass, companies like having complete control over bottle characteristics like shape, color, opacity, and surface roughness. All of these things play a part in presenting the beverage to consumers in just the right way—at least in the minds of today's fuzzy-headed marketers.

To make any re-use process efficient, one would have to greatly reduce the number of bottle configurations so bottles are no longer manufacturer-specific and can be reused in a way that minimizes transport distances. But moving to a system like this would largely remove the glass bottle from the marketing equation, and the beverage industry doesn't like that idea at all. Further, they perceive customers to be convenience oriented, and anything that might discourage them from making a purchase—such as not wanting to have to worry about returning a bottle to get the deposit back—is opposed by manufacturers.

THE CRITIC HAD A GLASS “BUT”...

One additional argument critics sometimes use to make glass-bottle reuse seem inefficient is to say that consumers would have to burn gasoline to get the bottles to the pickup point. This is a specious argument—if consumers take the bottles back to their grocery store as part of their normal shopping trip, there is no additional gasoline use. There would be extra gas used to get the collected bottles to the nearest sterilization plant, but such costs would be offset by lower curb-side recycling costs and lower energy costs for the bottler's processes.

The second barrier to bottle reuse is food-store chains, who are none-too-enthusiastic about the idea of having to collect bottles. It takes space and (usually) extra people to manage collection and deposit refunds.

The third major sticking point to glass bottle reuse is, I am sad to say, us. We consumers seem to be generally happy with a throw-away society—especially here in the US—and glass bottles are no exception. Many of us are willing to put our glass containers in the recycling bin, but less than 25% of glass packaging is recycled in the US. And anyway, the point of the article is that even if you are a good recycler, turning recycled glass bottles back into new bottles takes more energy than simply reusing them.

GLASS BOTTLE REUSE MAKES SENSE

There are a lot of hurdles to replacing our approach of recycling glass bottles with a new program of reusing them. It will require a change in consumer mindset and a large amount of grassroots pressure to overcome the hammerlock the beverage industry has on government lawmakers. But it can be done—that's how recycling programs got started!

You can get more information about refillable beverage containers, glass or otherwise, at the web site of the Grassroots Recycling Network.

Publish date: 18-OCT-2005

Know someone who would like this article on glass reuse and glass bottle packaging? Please forward it to them.

Books, other articles, and resources:

Get Grinning Planet free via email

 
RELATED GP ARTICLES
 

RECYCLING RATES ARE KICKING OUR CANS

The Benefits of Recycling at Home and at the Office

EARTH, AIR, WATER, AND POLLUTION—THE 4 BASIC ELEMENTS?

Air Pollution and Water Pollution — Are Zero-Emissions Goals Realistic?

 
 
Books for a Better Planet

For more reviews or purchase info, click on any title to go to Amazon.com

  book cover for The Perverse Economy, by Michael Perelman, 7/8/2005

The Impact of Markets on People and the Environment

From Adam Smith to the present day, economic theory has shortchanged the workers most crucial to the functioning of human life and offered skewed views of scarcity and extraction. Perelman shows how this approach has produced a discipline in which its followers' models and representations of the world around them are so removed from reality that continuing to abide by them will jeopardize both nature and humanity.

 
  book cover for Choose to Reuse, Nikki and David Goldbeck, Mar-1995

An Encyclopedia of Services, Businesses, Tools & Charitable Programs That Facilitate Reuse

A handy reference manual that lists a couple thousand resources where you can reuse, recycle, repair, restore, reclaim, refill, recharge, or resell just about anything your junk closet can dish out.

 
  book cover for Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, by William McDonough, Michael Braungart, 4/22/2002

Today's "cradle to grave" manufacturing model dates back to the Industrial Revolution and casts off as much as 90 percent of the materials it uses as waste, much of it toxic. The authors argue that products and processes should be designed so that wastes and worn-out products serve as useful manufacturing inputs, not trash and pollution.
(by William McDonough, Michael Braungart)

 

Search Amazon.com for more...

    


Or see more Books for a Better Planet

Back to Fall Cartoon

 

ADVERTISEMENT

foreground words say Bulk Foods - Stock Up Here; background words say Energy, Commodity Prices, Peak Oil, Financial Chaos
 

Hey, we don't pick
the Google ads!   – GP

 

 


"Space travel has given us a new appreciation for the Earth. We realize that the Earth is special. We've seen it from afar. We realize that the Earth is the only natural home for man we know of, and that we had better protect it."

— James Erwin, US astronaut


Abundant Earth - Natural, organic, healthy alternatives for people who care; opens in new window

 

Turn a child's love of animals into a love of reading with Zoobooks magazine, a magazine for kids; sign up now and receive FREE Elephants Zoobook and Tiger Poster; opens in new window

       
   >              
   > document gif Sign up to get Grinning Planet free by email, or get more info about it Email a link to this page to someone  
   > Issue Number 144
Copyright 2005 © Mark Jeantheau — All rights reserved.   More info