Skip to main content  
  Helping the environment one joke at a time, Grinning Planet. Click to go to home page. flying letter; click to go to signup page for free email version
Get GP free
via email !
Eco-Logical cartoon graphic of cube-shaped globe

Genetically Engineered Crops—The Scary Sequel to
"The Green Revolution"

Warning! A genetically engineered Chia Pet has escaped from an experimental farm and was last seen rampaging through nearby houses, rummaging through piles of opened Christmas presents, trying to find his lost siblings Shrubby and Fern. Authorities recommend that you stay calm, keep the hedge shears handy, and check your taste in gifts.

Warning—a real one this time—genetically modified plants may be coming to a field near you. Should you worry about this any more than your parents or grandparents worried about the post-WWII rise of chemical pesticides and other problems associated with "The Green Revolution"? We think so.

In the last Eco-Logical, we talked about the Green Revolution—the farming system that gained favor after World War II and that has become "the norm" in most parts of the industrialized world—noting some of the problems it has caused, including:

  • reduced soil fertility,
  • air and water pollution from chemical fertilizers and pesticides,
  • loss of beneficial pest predators, and
  • the rise of large-scale mono-cropping operations at the expense of smaller farms.

In the end, the Green Revolution will prove about as sustainable as Prince and the Revolution.

From the perspective of large agro-chemical companies—which are now also biotechnology companies—the solution to the decline of the Green picture of vegetables Revolution technologies (and company profits) lies in genetic engineering (GE) technologies. Using GE techniques, scientists will be able to manipulate plant genetics to allow the crops to overcome pests, diseases, poor soils, and unfavorable weather conditions. Or so they say.

If GE crops become even more widely adopted than they already are, we will add to the problems of the Green Revolution the following:

  • Potential hidden allergy risks and other unforeseen adverse human reactions to GE foods.
  • Increased genetic concentration of crop strains, thus reducing the disease and pest resistance offered by systems that employ many varieties.
  • Further removal of the means of food production from the hands of farmers and citizens and into the hands of transnational corporations via legal prohibitions against saving seed for planting the next year.
  • Incorporation of dangerous genetic technologies to prevent seeds from germinating the following planting year (so companies can make farmers re-purchase seed every year).
  • Contamination of non-GE crops with genetic material from GE crops, thus potentially imparting troublesome GE traits into ALL crops.
  • Loss of the use of Bt, an important natural pest control agent, as pests adapt to it via continual exposure through Bt corn, cotton, and potatoes (and other Bt-inclusive crops in the future).

It's too simplistic to say that all GM crops are definitely bad and that GE should be abandoned altogether. What is fair to say, though, is that the picture of farm field tests run so far on GM crops have been inadequate to demonstrate the long-term safety of the crops as food or as components of a stable global agricultural system. As the Green Revolution begins its decline, agricultural companies see GE crops as a vital new source of income. As the companies rush to introduce new GE products into production, those who are supposed to be regulating the process seem all too willing to defer to the judgment of the companies requesting approval. Safety is taking a back seat to profits.

Applying research and technology to farming is essential to ensuring adequate food supplies and robust global agricultural operations. What has happened, though, is that the vast majority of the research and technology pursued by corporations has been geared toward marketable products. If, since WWII, all of the resources that were spent on research into chemical fertilizers, chemical pesticides, and GE crops had been spent instead on improving non-chemical, non-GE approaches, farming would look a lot different today, and it would produce as much or more food—but without the environmental and social damage that the Green Revolution and its technologies have caused and that GE technologies may cause in the future.

We like to think that our governments are keeping us safe from harm, properly regulating industries and potentially dangerous new technologies. But it's often not so. Despite the good intentions of federal regulations, the US EPA is largely unable to protect us from the disastrous products of the pesticide industry, and as GE crops are queued up for approval, we're seeing similarly lax stewardship on the part of EPA, USDA, and FDA.

Only if we make a stink about it—a stink like we've just eaten too much GE cabbage-and-garlic soufflé—will the regulators and their congressional overlords find the strength to ensure the job gets done properly.

Related GP resource pages:

Publish date: 08-JAN-2004

Back to Part 1


You may have seen the abbreviation "GMO." It stands for "genetically modified organism" and describes any genetically engineered life form, including GE crops.

Get Grinning Planet free via email

Books for a Better Planet


Helpful Books on GE Crops, GMOs, and GM Food

(click on a title to go to Amazon for reviews or purchase info)

Back to joke page  |  More articles, by category



free audio news clips link; image of zombie kid - DON'T BE A MAINSTREAM MEDIA DRONE! - Free MP3 news download at Grinning Planet

Hey, we don't pick
the Google ads!   – GP




"Those who develop the technologies, who promote them and stand to profit most from them, are not those who suffer their risks. The analysis of technologies is biased toward their use because the technology promoters generally lack the expertise and the incentive to analyze the risks of the technologies for human health and the environment."

— H. Patricia Hynes
The Recurring Silent Spring


   > document gif Sign up to get Grinning Planet free by email, or get more info about it Email a link to this page to someone  
   > Issue Number 32
Copyright 2004 © Mark Jeantheau — All rights reserved.   More info

MP3 News Download
Video/Audio News Sites
Environmental News Sites
Investigative Journalism Sites

    - Articles/Resources By Topic
    - Articles By Date

Environmental Quotes
    - Funny Environmental Quotes
    - Peak Oil Quotes

Environmental Cartoons/Jokes
    - Environmental Videos/Animations

Environmental Products
Eco/Nature Greeting Cards

Grinning Planet Farm


Funny Jokes/Cartoons
    - Environmental Cartoons

Funny Animations/Videos
    - Environmental Animations/Videos

Funny Quotes
    - Environmental Funny Quotes


Environmental Books
Global Warming Books
Energy Books
Solar Energy Books
Peak Oil Books
Food-Gardening Books
Media Books


Environmental Movies
Environmental Songs
Environmental Music Videos

Album Reviews
Fun With Lyrics


Home Page
Site Map
About Us
Free Subscriptions
Privacy Policy